Head to head · 2025 batting

Brooks Baldwin vs Kyle Higashioka

In 2025 Kyle Higashioka has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brooks Baldwin CWS

Kyle Higashioka TEX

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Kyle Higashioka
G	102	93
PA	328	327
H	72	73
HR	11	11
RBI	38	47
SB	5	3
AVG	.240	.241
OBP	.290	.291
SLG	.407	.403
OPS	.697	.693
ISO	.167	.162
BB%	6.4%	6.1%
K%	26.2%	22.0%
wOBA	.303	.302
wRC+	92	96
WAR	0.6	1.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Brooks Baldwin	Kyle Higashioka
G	135	512
PA	449	1,699
H	96	343
2B	21	66
3B	1	2
HR	13	75
RBI	46	231
BB	27	105
SO	117	437
SB	9	5
AVG	.232	.218
SLG	.382	.406
WAR	0.7	4.3

Brooks Baldwin’s full profile →Kyle Higashioka’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brooks Baldwin vs

Kyle Higashioka vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.