Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Higashioka vs Mike Yastrzemski

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Higashioka TEX

Mike Yastrzemski ATL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Mike Yastrzemski
G	53	138
PA	186	408
H	36	81
HR	7	12
RBI	18	41
SB	0	1
AVG	.218	.224
OBP	.306	.309
SLG	.370	.380
OPS	.676	.688
ISO	.152	.155
BB%	10.2%	10.0%
K%	25.3%	24.0%
wOBA	.305	.308
wRC+	93	92
WAR	0.6	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Mike Yastrzemski
G	512	968
PA	1,699	3,547
H	343	735
2B	66	180
3B	2	24
HR	75	135
RBI	231	405
BB	105	370
SO	437	863
SB	5	26
AVG	.218	.236
SLG	.406	.440
WAR	4.3	13.4

Kyle Higashioka’s full profile →Mike Yastrzemski’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Higashioka vs

Mike Yastrzemski vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.