Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Chapman vs Mike Yastrzemski

So far in 2026 Matt Chapman has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Chapman SF

Mike Yastrzemski ATL

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Mike Yastrzemski
G	84	131
PA	352	386
H	72	78
HR	7	11
RBI	42	37
SB	0	1
AVG	.235	.228
OBP	.324	.311
SLG	.368	.383
OPS	.692	.694
ISO	.134	.155
BB%	10.5%	9.8%
K%	23.0%	24.1%
wOBA	.311	.311
wRC+	96	93
WAR	1.1	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Mike Yastrzemski
G	1,226	961
PA	5,122	3,525
H	1,073	732
2B	271	180
3B	24	24
HR	210	134
RBI	607	401
BB	553	367
SO	1,341	858
SB	35	26
AVG	.240	.237
SLG	.452	.440
WAR	28.3	13.4

Matt Chapman’s full profile →Mike Yastrzemski’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Chapman vs

Mike Yastrzemski vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.