Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Chapman vs Austin Hedges

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Chapman SF

Austin Hedges CLE

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Austin Hedges
G	84	74
PA	352	247
H	72	53
HR	7	6
RBI	42	25
SB	0	1
AVG	.235	.247
OBP	.324	.325
SLG	.368	.377
OPS	.692	.702
ISO	.134	.130
BB%	10.5%	10.1%
K%	23.0%	18.2%
wOBA	.311	.315
wRC+	97	97
WAR	1.1	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Austin Hedges
G	1,226	850
PA	5,122	2,786
H	1,073	475
2B	271	76
3B	24	2
HR	210	80
RBI	607	273
BB	553	185
SO	1,341	739
SB	35	17
AVG	.240	.190
SLG	.452	.318
WAR	28.4	-3.6

Matt Chapman’s full profile →Austin Hedges’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Chapman vs

Austin Hedges vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.