Head to head · 2026 batting

Miguel Amaya vs Matt Chapman

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Miguel Amaya CHC

Matt Chapman SF

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Miguel Amaya	Matt Chapman
G	77	84
PA	254	352
H	51	72
HR	6	7
RBI	28	42
SB	0	0
AVG	.237	.235
OBP	.340	.324
SLG	.377	.368
OPS	.717	.692
ISO	.140	.134
BB%	9.1%	10.5%
K%	26.4%	23.0%
wOBA	.326	.311
wRC+	105	97
WAR	1.1	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Miguel Amaya	Matt Chapman
G	264	1,226
PA	876	5,122
H	182	1,073
2B	38	271
3B	2	24
HR	23	210
RBI	118	607
BB	62	553
SO	191	1,341
SB	0	35
AVG	.236	.240
SLG	.381	.452
WAR	3.6	28.4

Miguel Amaya’s full profile →Matt Chapman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Miguel Amaya vs

Matt Chapman vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.