Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Chapman vs Nick Sogard

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Chapman SF

Nick Sogard BOS

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Nick Sogard
G	84	65
PA	352	277
H	72	61
HR	7	5
RBI	42	19
SB	0	1
AVG	.235	.255
OBP	.324	.342
SLG	.368	.385
OPS	.692	.727
ISO	.134	.130
BB%	10.5%	11.2%
K%	23.0%	20.2%
wOBA	.311	.328
wRC+	97	105
WAR	1.1	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Nick Sogard
G	1,226	119
PA	5,122	467
H	1,073	107
2B	271	26
3B	24	1
HR	210	5
RBI	607	36
BB	553	43
SO	1,341	105
SB	35	6
AVG	.240	.260
SLG	.452	.364
WAR	28.4	1.4

Matt Chapman’s full profile →Nick Sogard’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Chapman vs

Nick Sogard vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.