Head to head · 2026 batting

Austin Hedges vs Nick Sogard

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Austin Hedges CLE

Nick Sogard BOS

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Austin Hedges	Nick Sogard
G	74	65
PA	247	277
H	53	61
HR	6	5
RBI	25	19
SB	1	1
AVG	.247	.255
OBP	.325	.342
SLG	.377	.385
OPS	.702	.727
ISO	.130	.130
BB%	10.1%	11.2%
K%	18.2%	20.2%
wOBA	.315	.328
wRC+	97	105
WAR	1.1	1.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Austin Hedges	Nick Sogard
G	850	119
PA	2,786	467
H	475	107
2B	76	26
3B	2	1
HR	80	5
RBI	273	36
BB	185	43
SO	739	105
SB	17	6
AVG	.190	.260
SLG	.318	.364
WAR	-3.6	1.4

Austin Hedges’s full profile →Nick Sogard’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Austin Hedges vs

Nick Sogard vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.