Head to head · 2026 batting

Andrew Benintendi vs Mike Yastrzemski

In 2026 Mike Yastrzemski has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Andrew Benintendi CWS

Mike Yastrzemski ATL

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Andrew Benintendi	Mike Yastrzemski
G	141	138
PA	468	408
H	102	81
HR	15	12
RBI	78	41
SB	1	1
AVG	.242	.224
OBP	.304	.309
SLG	.416	.380
OPS	.720	.688
ISO	.173	.155
BB%	8.3%	10.0%
K%	23.9%	24.0%
wOBA	.314	.308
wRC+	99	92
WAR	0.3	0.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Andrew Benintendi	Mike Yastrzemski
G	26	11
PA	99	27
H	23	1
HR	2	0
RBI	10	1
BB	7	1
SO	25	8
SB	2	0
AVG	.253	.040
OBP	.313	.077
SLG	.374	.040
OPS	.687	.117

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Andrew Benintendi	Mike Yastrzemski
G	1,282	968
PA	5,244	3,547
H	1,237	735
2B	263	180
3B	24	24
HR	133	135
RBI	634	405
BB	481	370
SO	953	863
SB	87	26
AVG	.265	.236
SLG	.417	.440
WAR	15.2	13.4

Andrew Benintendi’s full profile →Mike Yastrzemski’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Andrew Benintendi vs

Mike Yastrzemski vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.