Head to head · 2025 batting

Jurickson Profar vs Mike Yastrzemski

In 2025 Jurickson Profar has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Jurickson Profar ATL

Mike Yastrzemski SF

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jurickson Profar	Mike Yastrzemski
G	80	144
PA	371	558
H	78	111
HR	14	17
RBI	43	46
SB	9	7
AVG	.245	.233
OBP	.353	.333
SLG	.434	.403
OPS	.787	.735
ISO	.189	.170
BB%	12.9%	12.9%
K%	15.9%	19.4%
wOBA	.349	.324
wRC+	125	107
WAR	2.0	1.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jurickson Profar	Mike Yastrzemski
G	26	11
PA	100	27
H	23	1
HR	1	0
RBI	6	1
BB	11	1
SO	15	8
SB	0	0
AVG	.258	.040
OBP	.340	.077
SLG	.292	.040
OPS	.632	.117

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jurickson Profar	Mike Yastrzemski
G	1,185	968
PA	4,662	3,547
H	995	735
2B	211	180
3B	18	24
HR	125	135
RBI	487	405
BB	478	370
SO	751	863
SB	66	26
AVG	.245	.236
SLG	.398	.440
WAR	15.1	13.4

Jurickson Profar’s full profile →Mike Yastrzemski’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jurickson Profar vs

Mike Yastrzemski vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.