Head to head · 2025 batting

Jurickson Profar vs Kyle Tucker

In 2025 Kyle Tucker has been worth 2.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jurickson Profar ATL

Kyle Tucker CHC

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jurickson Profar	Kyle Tucker
G	80	136
PA	371	597
H	78	133
HR	14	22
RBI	43	73
SB	9	25
AVG	.245	.266
OBP	.353	.377
SLG	.434	.464
OPS	.787	.841
ISO	.189	.198
BB%	12.9%	14.6%
K%	15.9%	14.7%
wOBA	.349	.366
wRC+	125	136
WAR	2.0	4.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jurickson Profar	Kyle Tucker
G	1,094	911
PA	4,321	3,759
H	925	869
2B	198	183
3B	18	24
HR	118	164
RBI	459	560
BB	452	440
SO	684	600
SB	64	130
AVG	.246	.267
SLG	.402	.489
WAR	14.8	25.1

Jurickson Profar’s full profile →Kyle Tucker’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jurickson Profar vs

Kyle Tucker vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.