Head to head · 2025 batting

Matt Chapman vs Jurickson Profar

In 2025 Matt Chapman has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Matt Chapman SF

Jurickson Profar ATL

2025 season

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Jurickson Profar
G	127	80
PA	535	371
H	105	78
HR	21	14
RBI	61	43
SB	9	9
AVG	.231	.245
OBP	.340	.353
SLG	.430	.434
OPS	.770	.787
ISO	.198	.189
BB%	13.3%	12.9%
K%	23.6%	15.9%
wOBA	.339	.349
wRC+	118	125
WAR	3.1	2.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Jurickson Profar
G	6	26
PA	26	100
H	6	23
HR	0	1
RBI	1	6
BB	3	11
SO	5	15
SB	0	0
AVG	.273	.258
OBP	.346	.340
SLG	.318	.292
OPS	.664	.632

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Jurickson Profar
G	1,226	1,185
PA	5,122	4,662
H	1,073	995
2B	271	211
3B	24	18
HR	210	125
RBI	607	487
BB	553	478
SO	1,341	751
SB	35	66
AVG	.240	.245
SLG	.452	.398
WAR	28.4	15.1

Matt Chapman’s full profile →Jurickson Profar’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Chapman vs

Jurickson Profar vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.