Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Higashioka vs Andrew Vaughn

So far in 2026 Andrew Vaughn has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Higashioka TEX

Andrew Vaughn MIL

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Andrew Vaughn
G	53	104
PA	186	331
H	36	88
HR	7	6
RBI	18	44
SB	0	0
AVG	.218	.306
OBP	.306	.390
SLG	.370	.444
OPS	.676	.834
ISO	.152	.139
BB%	10.2%	10.6%
K%	25.3%	16.0%
wOBA	.305	.371
wRC+	93	137
WAR	0.6	2.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Andrew Vaughn
G	512	777
PA	1,699	3,036
H	343	713
2B	66	150
3B	2	6
HR	75	92
RBI	231	383
BB	105	212
SO	437	591
SB	5	3
AVG	.218	.259
SLG	.406	.417
WAR	4.3	6.0

Kyle Higashioka’s full profile →Andrew Vaughn’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Higashioka vs

Andrew Vaughn vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.