Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Higashioka vs Danny Jansen

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Higashioka TEX

Danny Jansen TEX

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Danny Jansen
G	53	65
PA	186	227
H	36	40
HR	7	8
RBI	18	26
SB	0	1
AVG	.218	.203
OBP	.306	.296
SLG	.370	.381
OPS	.676	.677
ISO	.152	.178
BB%	10.2%	7.9%
K%	25.3%	24.2%
wOBA	.305	.302
wRC+	93	91
WAR	0.6	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Danny Jansen
G	512	638
PA	1,699	2,268
H	343	431
2B	66	92
3B	2	2
HR	75	96
RBI	231	282
BB	105	226
SO	437	479
SB	5	2
AVG	.218	.218
SLG	.406	.412
WAR	4.3	10.2

Kyle Higashioka’s full profile →Danny Jansen’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Higashioka vs

Danny Jansen vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.