Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting

Travis Bazzana vs Victor Mesa Jr.

In 2026 Travis Bazzana has been worth 1.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALCS, where the Tampa Bay Rays won 4-2 over the Cleveland Guardians.

Travis Bazzana CLE

Victor Mesa Jr.TB

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALCS.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Victor Mesa Jr.
G	6	6
PA	23	23
H	4	2
HR	1	0
RBI	1	0
BB	2	2
SO	4	8
SB	1	1
AVG	.190	.095
OBP	.261	.174
SLG	.333	.095
OPS	.594	.269

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Victor Mesa Jr.
G	11	14
PA	42	48
H	6	6
HR	1	1
RBI	2	2
BB	5	5
SO	8	17
SB	1	2
AVG	.162	.140
OBP	.262	.229
SLG	.297	.209
OPS	.559	.438

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Victor Mesa Jr.
G	124	74
PA	517	262
H	110	60
HR	15	14
RBI	57	34
SB	19	9
AVG	.245	.255
OBP	.335	.323
SLG	.408	.489
OPS	.742	.812
ISO	.163	.234
BB%	10.8%	8.8%
K%	20.7%	20.2%
wOBA	.330	.352
wRC+	107	123
WAR	2.7	1.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Victor Mesa Jr.
G	124	88
PA	517	300
H	110	66
2B	22	9
3B	3	3
HR	15	15
RBI	57	40
BB	56	28
SO	107	58
SB	19	9
AVG	.245	.247
SLG	.408	.472
WAR	2.7	1.5

Travis Bazzana’s full profile →Victor Mesa Jr.’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Travis Bazzana vs

Victor Mesa Jr. vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.