Head to head · 2026 pitching

Hunter Brown vs Christian Scott

In 2026 Christian Scott has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Hunter Brown HOU

Christian Scott NYM

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Hunter Brown	Christian Scott
G	20	23
GS	20	23
IP	107.1	110.0
W	6	4
SO	124	134
ERA	3.19	3.85
FIP	3.77	3.61
WHIP	1.27	1.27
K/9	10.4	11.0
BB/9	4.6	3.8
FIP−	90	86
WAR	1.8	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Hunter Brown	Christian Scott
G	120	32
GS	112	32
IP	638.2	157.1
W	42	4
L	35	8
SV	0	0
SO	709	173
BB	234	59
ERA	3.44	4.06
WHIP	1.22	1.25
K/9	10.0	9.9
BB/9	3.3	3.4
HR/9	1.0	1.1
WAR	11.6	2.3

Hunter Brown’s full profile →Christian Scott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Hunter Brown vs

Christian Scott vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.