Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Drake Baldwin vs Bryson Stott

In 2026 Drake Baldwin has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the Atlanta Braves won 2-1 over the Philadelphia Phillies.

Drake Baldwin ATL

Bryson Stott PHI

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Bryson Stott
G	3	3
PA	13	13
H	2	2
HR	0	0
RBI	1	0
BB	0	0
SO	3	5
SB	0	0
AVG	.154	.154
OBP	.154	.154
SLG	.231	.154
OPS	.385	.308

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Bryson Stott
G	7	40
PA	30	142
H	3	23
HR	0	1
RBI	2	14
BB	3	13
SO	8	39
SB	0	6
AVG	.111	.181
OBP	.200	.255
SLG	.148	.260
OPS	.348	.515

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Bryson Stott
G	138	155
PA	615	608
H	156	137
HR	25	10
RBI	79	67
SB	3	27
AVG	.284	.256
OBP	.358	.334
SLG	.459	.401
OPS	.817	.736
ISO	.175	.146
BB%	8.9%	10.2%
K%	21.5%	16.4%
wOBA	.359	.328
wRC+	126	102
WAR	4.0	3.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Bryson Stott
G	261	723
PA	1,061	2,845
H	267	653
2B	39	128
3B	2	15
HR	44	59
RBI	159	301
BB	93	244
SO	200	473
SB	3	126
AVG	.280	.256
SLG	.463	.387
WAR	7.5	13.2

Drake Baldwin’s full profile →Bryson Stott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Drake Baldwin vs

Bryson Stott vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.