DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Chase Burns vs Nolan McLean

In 2026 Chase Burns has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticChase BurnsNolan McLean
G2931
GS2931
IP154.1179.2
W1512
SO185194
ERA2.863.16
FIP3.253.59
WHIP1.171.17
K/910.89.7
BB/93.33.5
FIP−7886
WAR3.53.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticChase BurnsNolan McLean
G1—
GS0—
IP1.2—
W0—
SV0—
SO1—
BB0—
ERA0.00—
WHIP0.00—
K/95.4—
BB/90.0—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticChase BurnsNolan McLean
G4239
GS3739
IP197.2227.2
W1517
L611
SV00
SO252251
BB7286
ERA3.232.93
WHIP1.201.14
K/911.59.9
BB/93.33.4
HR/91.00.8
WAR4.74.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.