Head to head · 2026 batting

Jac Caglianone vs Austin Hedges

So far in 2026 Jac Caglianone has been worth 2.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jac Caglianone KC

Austin Hedges CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jac Caglianone	Austin Hedges
G	137	71
PA	527	236
H	136	52
HR	23	5
RBI	71	24
SB	7	1
AVG	.279	.251
OBP	.332	.323
SLG	.485	.372
OPS	.817	.695
ISO	.205	.121
BB%	6.1%	9.3%
K%	26.4%	18.2%
wOBA	.354	.312
wRC+	120	94
WAR	2.9	0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jac Caglianone	Austin Hedges
G	199	847
PA	759	2,775
H	169	474
2B	33	76
3B	3	2
HR	30	79
RBI	89	272
BB	50	182
SO	191	737
SB	8	17
AVG	.242	.190
SLG	.428	.318
WAR	1.9	-3.7

Jac Caglianone’s full profile →Austin Hedges’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jac Caglianone vs

Austin Hedges vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.