Head to head · 2026 batting
Leo Bernal vs James McCann
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.7 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Leo Bernal | James McCann |
|---|---|---|
| G | 24 | 48 |
| PA | 102 | 166 |
| H | 27 | 44 |
| HR | 5 | 7 |
| RBI | 21 | 28 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .284 | .282 |
| OBP | .333 | .311 |
| SLG | .474 | .455 |
| OPS | .807 | .766 |
| ISO | .189 | .173 |
| BB% | 6.9% | 3.6% |
| K% | 24.5% | 25.3% |
| wOBA | .352 | .332 |
| wRC+ | 128 | 110 |
| WAR | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Leo Bernal | James McCann |
|---|---|---|
| G | — | 3 |
| PA | — | 9 |
| H | — | 1 |
| HR | — | 0 |
| RBI | — | 0 |
| BB | — | 0 |
| SO | — | 5 |
| SB | — | 0 |
| AVG | — | .125 |
| OBP | — | .222 |
| SLG | — | .125 |
| OPS | — | .347 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Leo Bernal | James McCann |
|---|---|---|
| G | 24 | 981 |
| PA | 102 | 3,610 |
| H | 27 | 809 |
| 2B | 3 | 140 |
| 3B | 0 | 10 |
| HR | 5 | 104 |
| RBI | 21 | 418 |
| BB | 7 | 208 |
| SO | 25 | 922 |
| SB | 0 | 15 |
| AVG | .284 | .244 |
| SLG | .474 | .386 |
| WAR | 0.7 | 8.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.