Head to head · 2026 batting

Leo Bernal vs James McCann

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.7 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Leo Bernal STL

James McCann AZ

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Leo Bernal	James McCann
G	24	48
PA	102	166
H	27	44
HR	5	7
RBI	21	28
SB	0	0
AVG	.284	.282
OBP	.333	.311
SLG	.474	.455
OPS	.807	.766
ISO	.189	.173
BB%	6.9%	3.6%
K%	24.5%	25.3%
wOBA	.352	.332
wRC+	128	110
WAR	0.7	0.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Leo Bernal	James McCann
G	24	975
PA	102	3,598
H	27	806
2B	3	139
3B	0	10
HR	5	104
RBI	21	418
BB	7	208
SO	25	920
SB	0	14
AVG	.284	.244
SLG	.474	.386
WAR	0.7	8.3

Leo Bernal’s full profile →James McCann’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Leo Bernal vs

James McCann vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.