Head to head · 2026 batting

James McCann vs Andruw Monasterio

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

James McCann AZ

Andruw Monasterio BOS

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	James McCann	Andruw Monasterio
G	44	100
PA	152	329
H	40	71
HR	5	6
RBI	24	40
SB	0	4
AVG	.282	.239
OBP	.313	.299
SLG	.430	.384
OPS	.743	.683
ISO	.148	.145
BB%	3.9%	7.3%
K%	25.7%	19.5%
wOBA	.324	.302
wRC+	104	86
WAR	0.6	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	James McCann	Andruw Monasterio
G	971	292
PA	3,584	921
H	802	204
2B	139	51
3B	10	2
HR	102	14
RBI	414	99
BB	208	75
SO	917	202
SB	14	19
AVG	.243	.246
SLG	.385	.363
WAR	8.1	1.9

James McCann’s full profile →Andruw Monasterio’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

James McCann vs

Andruw Monasterio vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.