Head to head · 2026 batting

Nathan Church vs Trea Turner

In 2026 Trea Turner has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Nathan Church STL

Trea Turner PHI

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nathan Church	Trea Turner
G	133	157
PA	470	700
H	107	156
HR	10	19
RBI	50	58
SB	10	21
AVG	.247	.242
OBP	.290	.297
SLG	.364	.378
OPS	.654	.675
ISO	.118	.136
BB%	5.3%	6.9%
K%	17.2%	21.0%
wOBA	.289	.299
wRC+	83	83
WAR	0.8	2.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Nathan Church	Trea Turner
G	152	1,416
PA	535	6,306
H	117	1,687
2B	18	311
3B	2	49
HR	11	205
RBI	58	699
BB	28	431
SO	99	1,175
SB	11	336
AVG	.239	.291
SLG	.351	.467
WAR	0.6	49.6

Nathan Church’s full profile →Trea Turner’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nathan Church vs

Trea Turner vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.