DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Parker Messick vs Trevor Rogers

In 2026 Parker Messick has been worth 1.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticParker MessickTrevor Rogers
G3230
GS3230
IP186.1169.2
W1210
SO193157
ERA2.564.03
FIP3.073.45
WHIP1.061.18
K/99.38.3
BB/92.42.1
FIP−7383
WAR4.73.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticParker MessickTrevor Rogers
G41
GS40
IP13.21.2
W00
SV00
SO172
BB101
ERA3.9510.80
WHIP1.983.00
K/911.210.8
BB/96.65.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticParker MessickTrevor Rogers
G39132
GS39132
IP226.0689.2
W1534
L1048
SV00
SO231678
BB55234
ERA2.593.88
WHIP1.111.27
K/99.28.8
BB/92.23.1
HR/90.80.9
WAR5.813.3

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.