Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Sam Antonacci vs Isaac Paredes
In 2026 Isaac Paredes has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Sam Antonacci | Isaac Paredes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 2 |
| PA | 9 | 8 |
| H | 2 | 1 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 2 | 0 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| SO | 1 | 2 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .286 | .167 |
| OBP | .444 | .375 |
| SLG | .429 | .167 |
| OPS | .873 | .542 |
| Statistic | Sam Antonacci | Isaac Paredes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 7 | 6 |
| PA | 27 | 20 |
| H | 5 | 6 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 5 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 2 |
| SO | 3 | 4 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .250 | .353 |
| OBP | .407 | .450 |
| SLG | .300 | .412 |
| OPS | .707 | .862 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Sam Antonacci | Isaac Paredes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 139 | 155 |
| PA | 557 | 659 |
| H | 133 | 147 |
| HR | 8 | 25 |
| RBI | 48 | 94 |
| SB | 20 | 0 |
| AVG | .277 | .262 |
| OBP | .370 | .360 |
| SLG | .396 | .447 |
| OPS | .766 | .806 |
| ISO | .119 | .185 |
| BB% | 7.7% | 10.8% |
| K% | 14.7% | 13.4% |
| wOBA | .348 | .358 |
| wRC+ | 122 | 130 |
| WAR | 3.2 | 4.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Sam Antonacci | Isaac Paredes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 139 | 712 |
| PA | 557 | 2,883 |
| H | 133 | 600 |
| 2B | 25 | 114 |
| 3B | 4 | 4 |
| HR | 8 | 117 |
| RBI | 48 | 381 |
| BB | 43 | 317 |
| SO | 82 | 475 |
| SB | 20 | 2 |
| AVG | .277 | .242 |
| SLG | .396 | .433 |
| WAR | 3.2 | 15.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

