Head to head · 2026 batting

A.J. Ewing vs Konnor Griffin

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.9 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

A.J. Ewing NYM

Konnor Griffin PIT

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	A.J. Ewing	Konnor Griffin
G	120	79
PA	492	339
H	110	85
HR	11	6
RBI	43	33
SB	25	23
AVG	.252	.272
OBP	.324	.324
SLG	.376	.404
OPS	.700	.728
ISO	.124	.131
BB%	9.3%	5.9%
K%	25.4%	24.2%
wOBA	.313	.323
wRC+	97	99
WAR	1.9	1.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	A.J. Ewing	Konnor Griffin
G	120	79
PA	492	339
H	110	85
2B	19	15
3B	1	4
HR	11	6
RBI	43	33
BB	46	20
SO	125	82
SB	25	23
AVG	.252	.272
SLG	.376	.404
WAR	1.9	1.9

A.J. Ewing’s full profile →Konnor Griffin’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

A.J. Ewing vs

Konnor Griffin vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.