Head to head · 2026 batting

A.J. Ewing vs Dane Myers

In 2026 A.J. Ewing has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

A.J. Ewing NYM

Dane Myers CIN

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	A.J. Ewing	Dane Myers
G	120	108
PA	492	334
H	110	74
HR	11	8
RBI	43	25
SB	25	10
AVG	.252	.253
OBP	.324	.341
SLG	.376	.373
OPS	.700	.715
ISO	.124	.120
BB%	9.3%	11.1%
K%	25.4%	24.6%
wOBA	.313	.324
wRC+	97	107
WAR	1.9	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	A.J. Ewing	Dane Myers
G	120	274
PA	492	845
H	110	189
2B	19	30
3B	1	1
HR	11	18
RBI	43	84
BB	46	70
SO	125	214
SB	25	33
AVG	.252	.248
SLG	.376	.361
WAR	1.9	2.4

A.J. Ewing’s full profile →Dane Myers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

A.J. Ewing vs

Dane Myers vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.