Head to head · 2026 batting

Luke Keaschall vs Jakob Marsee

In 2026 Luke Keaschall has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Luke Keaschall MIN

Jakob Marsee MIA

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Jakob Marsee
G	152	152
PA	620	616
H	149	119
HR	10	11
RBI	52	41
SB	20	23
AVG	.282	.231
OBP	.374	.348
SLG	.407	.359
OPS	.781	.706
ISO	.125	.128
BB%	9.5%	12.7%
K%	14.0%	20.5%
wOBA	.351	.325
wRC+	125	107
WAR	3.9	2.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Jakob Marsee
G	201	207
PA	827	850
H	204	180
2B	42	37
3B	4	10
HR	14	16
RBI	80	74
BB	78	100
SO	116	174
SB	34	37
AVG	.287	.248
SLG	.417	.393
WAR	5.7	4.9

Luke Keaschall’s full profile →Jakob Marsee’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luke Keaschall vs

Jakob Marsee vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.