Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Munetaka Murakami vs Brayan Rocchio

In 2026 Munetaka Murakami has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Cleveland Guardians won 3-2 over the Chicago White Sox.

Munetaka Murakami CWS

Brayan Rocchio CLE

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Munetaka Murakami	Brayan Rocchio
G	5	5
PA	21	18
H	4	2
HR	1	0
RBI	4	1
BB	2	3
SO	11	3
SB	1	1
AVG	.211	.143
OBP	.286	.294
SLG	.368	.143
OPS	.654	.437

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Munetaka Murakami	Brayan Rocchio
G	7	24
PA	31	87
H	5	18
HR	1	2
RBI	5	5
BB	3	8
SO	16	19
SB	1	1
AVG	.185	.234
OBP	.258	.306
SLG	.296	.338
OPS	.554	.644

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Munetaka Murakami	Brayan Rocchio
G	127	153
PA	553	592
H	94	135
HR	35	15
RBI	77	73
SB	1	20
AVG	.207	.253
OBP	.347	.313
SLG	.478	.391
OPS	.825	.705
ISO	.271	.139
BB%	16.6%	6.4%
K%	35.4%	14.4%
wOBA	.359	.313
wRC+	130	95
WAR	3.1	2.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Munetaka Murakami	Brayan Rocchio
G	127	418
PA	553	1,503
H	94	314
2B	16	67
3B	1	4
HR	35	28
RBI	77	161
BB	92	108
SO	196	279
SB	1	38
AVG	.207	.234
SLG	.478	.352
WAR	3.1	3.5

Munetaka Murakami’s full profile →Brayan Rocchio’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Munetaka Murakami vs

Brayan Rocchio vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.