Players · H · Pitcher · 2025
Andrew Heaney
- Age
- 34
- B/T
- L/L
- Height
- 6' 2"
- Weight
- 200 lb
- Number
- #33
- Born
- June 5, 1991 in Oklahoma City, OK, United States
- MLB debut
- June 19, 2014
- Drafted
- 2009, round 24
- College
- Oklahoma State
- High school
- Putnam City
- Salary, 2025
- $5.25M
- dbWAR
- 9.5 14 season(s)
- IP
- 122.1
- ERA
- 5.52
- FIP
- 5.59
- K/9
- 6.3
- FIP−
- 134 100 = avg
Andrew Heaney was a starting pitcher for the Pittsburgh Pirates. In 2025 he struck out 86 batters over 122.1 innings across 27 appearances, 23 of them starts, going 5-10. His ERA of 5.52 was 32.7% higher than the league average of 4.16 — 17th of 19 on his team, and 450th of 542 among MLB pitchers with 20+ innings. Stripping out defence, his 5.59 FIP suggests the ERA was no fluke. He missed bats on 19.9% of swings (9.5% of every pitch he threw), walked 7.5% of the batters he faced and struck out 16.0%. His -0.7 dbWAR is built from that FIP rather than runs allowed, so it credits him for what he controls and not for the defence behind him.
League context
Percentile among qualified pitchers, 2025.
WAR by season
Pitching
Standard and advanced, by season.
| Trend | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PIT/LAD | 27 | 23 | 122.1 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 129 | 75 | 86 | 40 | 5.52 | 5.59 | 1.38 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 133 | 134 | -0.7 | |
| 2024 | TEX | 32 | 31 | 160.0 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 159 | 76 | 159 | 41 | 4.28 | 4.04 | 1.25 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 105 | 99 | 1.8 | |
| 2023 | TEX | 34 | 28 | 147.1 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 143 | 68 | 151 | 60 | 4.15 | 4.66 | 1.38 | 9.2 | 3.7 | 96 | 108 | 1.3 | |
| 2022 | LAD | 16 | 14 | 72.2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 60 | 25 | 110 | 19 | 3.10 | 3.75 | 1.09 | 13.6 | 2.4 | 78 | 94 | 1.1 | |
| 2021 | LAA/NYY | 30 | 23 | 129.2 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 130 | 84 | 150 | 41 | 5.83 | 4.85 | 1.32 | 10.4 | 2.8 | 137 | 114 | 0.6 | |
| 2020 | LAA | 12 | 12 | 66.2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 63 | 33 | 70 | 19 | 4.46 | 3.79 | 1.23 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 100 | 85 | 1.4 | |
| 2019 | LAA | 18 | 18 | 95.1 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 93 | 52 | 118 | 30 | 4.91 | 4.63 | 1.29 | 11.1 | 2.8 | 109 | 103 | 1.0 | |
| 2018 | LAA | 30 | 30 | 180.0 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 171 | 83 | 180 | 45 | 4.15 | 3.99 | 1.20 | 9.0 | 2.3 | 100 | 96 | 2.4 | |
| 2017 | LAA | 5 | 5 | 21.2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 27 | 17 | 27 | 9 | 7.06 | 9.11 | 1.66 | 11.2 | 3.7 | 162 | 209 | -0.9 | |
| 2016 | LAA | 1 | 1 | 6.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 6.00 | 5.15 | 1.17 | 10.5 | 0.0 | 143 | 123 | 0.0 | |
| 2015 | LAA | 18 | 18 | 105.2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 99 | 41 | 78 | 28 | 3.49 | 3.73 | 1.20 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 88 | 94 | 1.4 |
Batting
Standard and advanced, by season.
Platoon splits
How left- and right-handed hitters fare against him.
| Split | PA | AB | H | HR | BB | SO | AVG | OBP | SLG | wOBA | K% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LHB | 149 | 135 | 42 | 10 | 9 | 22 | .311 | .365 | .630 | .418 | 14.8% |
| vs RHB | 387 | 344 | 87 | 15 | 31 | 64 | .253 | .323 | .451 | .336 | 16.5% |
Pitch sequencing
What Andrew Heaney throws in each count, and what he follows each pitch with. Select any cell for the breakdown.
Select a count to see exactly what Andrew Heaney throws in it.
Pitch arsenal
What he throws, how hard, how often it misses, and what hitters do with it.
| Four-Seam Fastball | 908 | 90.1 | 2,375 | 48.8% | 17.4% | 200 | .275 | .917 | |
| Changeup | 360 | 82.0 | 2,107 | 34.4% | 19.3% | 104 | .212 | .589 | |
| Slider | 346 | 80.5 | 2,475 | 43.1% | 30.2% | 76 | .276 | .883 | |
| Sinker | 234 | 89.2 | 2,363 | 44.4% | 11.3% | 62 | .258 | .803 | |
| Curveball | 120 | 76.8 | 2,606 | 46.7% | 19.0% | 27 | .370 | .874 | |
| Slow Curve | 112 | 73.5 | 2,507 | 45.5% | 37.0% | 11 | — | — |
Head to head
Put Andrew Heaney beside up to three others.
Or read one already written — Andrew Heaney against:
Similar players
Nearest 2025 seasons by command, run prevention and role, on rate statistics rather than totals.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season's own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page.