Head to head · Career batting

David Ortiz vs Mike Trout

In 2016 Mike Trout has been worth 3.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

David Ortiz BOS

Mike Trout LAA

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	David Ortiz	Mike Trout
G	1,674	1,788
PA	7,220	7,837
H	1,775	1,878
2B	438	351
3B	11	55
HR	411	426
RBI	1,290	1,072
BB	1,000	1,174
SO	1,195	1,828
SB	13	225
AVG	.289	.290
SLG	.565	.558
WAR	48.8	89.9

2016 season

2016 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	David Ortiz	Mike Trout
G	151	159
PA	626	681
H	169	173
HR	38	29
RBI	127	100
SB	2	30
AVG	.315	.315
OBP	.401	.441
SLG	.620	.550
OPS	1.021	.991
ISO	.305	.235
BB%	12.8%	17.0%
K%	13.7%	20.1%
wOBA	.425	.423
wRC+	161	173
WAR	5.1	8.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	David Ortiz	Mike Trout
G	50	3
PA	219	15
H	49	1
HR	10	1
RBI	30	1
BB	41	3
SO	37	2
SB	0	0
AVG	.283	.083
OBP	.416	.267
SLG	.549	.333
OPS	.965	.600

David Ortiz’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

David Ortiz vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.