Head to head · Career batting

Paul Goldschmidt vs David Wright

In 2018 Paul Goldschmidt has been worth 5.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Paul Goldschmidt AZ

David Wright NYM

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	David Wright
G	2,169	1,516
PA	9,206	6,589
H	2,277	1,700
2B	490	373
3B	25	25
HR	390	228
RBI	1,284	930
BB	1,115	748
SO	2,065	1,252
SB	175	190
AVG	.286	.296
SLG	.501	.489
WAR	59.7	51.9

2018 season

2018 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	David Wright
G	158	2
PA	690	3
H	172	0
HR	33	0
RBI	83	0
SB	7	0
AVG	.290	.000
OBP	.389	.333
SLG	.533	.000
OPS	.922	.333
ISO	.243	.000
BB%	13.0%	33.3%
K%	25.1%	0.0%
wOBA	.395	.235
wRC+	151	46
WAR	5.3	-0.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	David Wright
G	32	24
PA	121	106
H	28	18
HR	8	2
RBI	16	13
BB	11	15
SO	28	28
SB	1	1
AVG	.262	.198
OBP	.347	.311
SLG	.533	.319
OPS	.880	.630

Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →David Wright’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Paul Goldschmidt vs

David Wright vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.