Head to head · Career batting

Paul Goldschmidt vs Bryce Harper

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 3.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Paul Goldschmidt NYY

Bryce Harper PHI

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Bryce Harper
G	2,169	1,946
PA	9,206	8,358
H	2,277	1,956
2B	490	433
3B	25	27
HR	390	392
RBI	1,284	1,138
BB	1,115	1,212
SO	2,065	1,802
SB	175	159
AVG	.286	.279
SLG	.501	.516
WAR	59.7	63.4

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Bryce Harper
G	104	161
PA	380	693
H	87	155
HR	18	29
RBI	52	87
SB	1	7
AVG	.252	.269
OBP	.313	.380
SLG	.452	.485
OPS	.765	.865
ISO	.200	.217
BB%	7.6%	15.4%
K%	22.6%	21.4%
wOBA	.332	.378
wRC+	105	136
WAR	0.9	4.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Paul Goldschmidt	Bryce Harper
G	32	60
PA	121	263
H	28	60
HR	8	18
RBI	16	36
BB	11	38
SO	28	61
SB	1	8
AVG	.262	.271
OBP	.347	.382
SLG	.533	.593
OPS	.880	.974

Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →Bryce Harper’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Paul Goldschmidt vs

Bryce Harper vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.