Head to head · Career batting

Freddie Freeman vs Matt Holliday

In 2018 Freddie Freeman has been worth 4.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Freddie Freeman ATL

Matt Holliday COL

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Matt Holliday
G	2,323	1,780
PA	10,020	7,542
H	2,598	1,980
2B	579	437
3B	34	29
HR	383	302
RBI	1,392	1,163
BB	1,136	771
SO	1,879	1,276
SB	111	105
AVG	.299	.300
SLG	.505	.512
WAR	70.6	51.1

2018 season

2018 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Matt Holliday
G	162	25
PA	707	65
H	191	15
HR	23	2
RBI	98	3
SB	10	0
AVG	.309	.283
OBP	.388	.415
SLG	.505	.434
OPS	.892	.849
ISO	.196	.151
BB%	10.7%	18.5%
K%	18.7%	27.7%
wOBA	.382	.381
wRC+	140	133
WAR	4.9	0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Matt Holliday
G	87	77
PA	381	314
H	84	71
HR	18	13
RBI	42	37
BB	45	18
SO	71	62
SB	4	1
AVG	.256	.245
OBP	.354	.303
SLG	.479	.421
OPS	.833	.723

Freddie Freeman’s full profile →Matt Holliday’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Freddie Freeman vs

Matt Holliday vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.