Head to head · Career batting

Matt Holliday vs Andrew McCutchen

In 2018 Andrew McCutchen has been worth 2.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Matt Holliday COL

Andrew McCutchen SF

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Matt Holliday	Andrew McCutchen
G	1,780	2,299
PA	7,542	9,790
H	1,980	2,280
2B	437	453
3B	29	50
HR	302	333
RBI	1,163	1,157
BB	771	1,192
SO	1,276	1,915
SB	105	220
AVG	.300	.271
SLG	.512	.455
WAR	51.1	61.1

2018 season

2018 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Holliday	Andrew McCutchen
G	25	155
PA	65	682
H	15	145
HR	2	20
RBI	3	65
SB	0	14
AVG	.283	.255
OBP	.415	.368
SLG	.434	.424
OPS	.849	.792
ISO	.151	.169
BB%	18.5%	13.9%
K%	27.7%	21.3%
wOBA	.381	.352
wRC+	133	123
WAR	0.4	3.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Matt Holliday	Andrew McCutchen
G	77	13
PA	314	53
H	71	11
HR	13	0
RBI	37	1
BB	18	7
SO	62	7
SB	1	0
AVG	.245	.239
OBP	.303	.340
SLG	.421	.261
OPS	.723	.600

Matt Holliday’s full profile →Andrew McCutchen’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Holliday vs

Andrew McCutchen vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.