Head to head · 2026 batting

Mike Trout vs Brice Turang

In 2026 Brice Turang has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2026 by dbWAR.
Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Mike Trout LAA

Brice Turang MIL

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mike Trout	Brice Turang
G	142	150
PA	634	680
H	124	157
HR	22	21
RBI	54	101
SB	11	19
AVG	.242	.270
OBP	.382	.367
SLG	.421	.452
OPS	.803	.819
ISO	.179	.182
BB%	16.9%	13.2%
K%	26.0%	25.1%
wOBA	.358	.362
wRC+	134	130
WAR	4.4	5.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Mike Trout	Brice Turang
G	3	27
PA	15	112
H	1	21
HR	1	2
RBI	1	7
BB	3	15
SO	2	27
SB	0	4
AVG	.083	.221
OBP	.267	.327
SLG	.333	.368
OPS	.600	.696

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Mike Trout	Brice Turang
G	1,788	587
PA	7,837	2,406
H	1,878	555
2B	351	98
3B	55	12
HR	426	52
RBI	1,072	273
BB	1,174	244
SO	1,828	520
SB	225	119
AVG	.290	.261
SLG	.558	.391
WAR	89.9	13.4

Mike Trout’s full profile →Brice Turang’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mike Trout vs

Brice Turang vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.