Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Brice Turang

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Brice Turang MIL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Brice Turang
G	162	150
PA	726	680
H	175	157
HR	45	21
RBI	107	101
SB	41	19
AVG	.280	.270
OBP	.372	.367
SLG	.570	.452
OPS	.943	.819
ISO	.291	.182
BB%	11.4%	13.2%
K%	25.8%	25.1%
wOBA	.402	.362
wRC+	157	130
WAR	8.7	5.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Brice Turang
G	448	587
PA	1,802	2,406
H	409	555
2B	81	98
3B	18	12
HR	86	52
RBI	250	273
BB	136	244
SO	447	520
SB	105	119
AVG	.255	.261
SLG	.489	.391
WAR	13.6	13.4

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Brice Turang’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Brice Turang vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.