Head to head · Career batting

Bryce Harper vs Andrew McCutchen

In 2026 Bryce Harper has been worth 4.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Bryce Harper PHI

Andrew McCutchen TEX

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Andrew McCutchen
G	1,946	2,299
PA	8,358	9,790
H	1,956	2,280
2B	433	453
3B	27	50
HR	392	333
RBI	1,138	1,157
BB	1,212	1,192
SO	1,802	1,915
SB	159	220
AVG	.279	.271
SLG	.516	.455
WAR	63.4	61.1

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Andrew McCutchen
G	161	37
PA	693	83
H	155	14
HR	29	1
RBI	87	5
SB	7	0
AVG	.269	.192
OBP	.380	.277
SLG	.485	.260
OPS	.865	.537
ISO	.217	.068
BB%	15.4%	10.8%
K%	21.4%	26.5%
wOBA	.378	.252
wRC+	136	55
WAR	4.3	-0.3

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Bryce Harper	Andrew McCutchen
G	60	13
PA	263	53
H	60	11
HR	18	0
RBI	36	1
BB	38	7
SO	61	7
SB	8	0
AVG	.271	.239
OBP	.382	.340
SLG	.593	.261
OPS	.974	.600

Bryce Harper’s full profile →Andrew McCutchen’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Bryce Harper vs

Andrew McCutchen vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.