Head to head · 2026 batting

Xander Bogaerts vs Jeremy Peña

So far in 2026 Jeremy Peña has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Xander Bogaerts SD

Jeremy Peña HOU

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Jeremy Peña
G	147	104
PA	585	451
H	115	115
HR	12	20
RBI	56	51
SB	21	9
AVG	.228	.276
OBP	.326	.326
SLG	.339	.475
OPS	.666	.801
ISO	.111	.199
BB%	12.3%	5.3%
K%	18.1%	23.7%
wOBA	.304	.348
wRC+	94	123
WAR	2.6	3.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Jeremy Peña
G	1,645	671
PA	7,010	2,836
H	1,797	709
2B	372	129
3B	18	11
HR	196	84
RBI	843	298
BB	621	149
SO	1,225	575
SB	144	73
AVG	.287	.272
SLG	.445	.426
WAR	48.3	17.5

Xander Bogaerts’s full profile →Jeremy Peña’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Xander Bogaerts vs

Jeremy Peña vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.