Head to head · 2026 batting

Xander Bogaerts vs Bryson Stott

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 2.6 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Xander Bogaerts SD

Bryson Stott PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Bryson Stott
G	147	148
PA	585	579
H	115	128
HR	12	10
RBI	56	65
SB	21	25
AVG	.228	.250
OBP	.326	.325
SLG	.339	.390
OPS	.666	.715
ISO	.111	.140
BB%	12.3%	9.7%
K%	18.1%	17.1%
wOBA	.304	.320
wRC+	94	96
WAR	2.6	2.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Xander Bogaerts	Bryson Stott
G	1,645	716
PA	7,010	2,816
H	1,797	644
2B	372	122
3B	18	15
HR	196	59
RBI	843	299
BB	621	238
SO	1,225	472
SB	144	124
AVG	.287	.255
SLG	.445	.385
WAR	48.3	12.6

Xander Bogaerts’s full profile →Bryson Stott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Xander Bogaerts vs

Bryson Stott vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.