Head to head · 2026 batting

Carlos Correa vs Paul Goldschmidt

In 2026 Carlos Correa has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Carlos Correa HOU

Paul Goldschmidt NYY

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Carlos Correa	Paul Goldschmidt
G	32	104
PA	141	380
H	34	87
HR	3	18
RBI	16	52
SB	1	1
AVG	.279	.252
OBP	.369	.313
SLG	.418	.452
OPS	.787	.765
ISO	.139	.200
BB%	12.8%	7.6%
K%	18.4%	22.6%
wOBA	.350	.332
wRC+	125	105
WAR	1.0	0.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Carlos Correa	Paul Goldschmidt
G	85	32
PA	358	121
H	91	28
HR	18	8
RBI	63	16
BB	31	11
SO	84	28
SB	1	1
AVG	.282	.262
OBP	.352	.347
SLG	.508	.533
OPS	.860	.880

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Carlos Correa	Paul Goldschmidt
G	1,282	2,169
PA	5,485	9,206
H	1,332	2,277
2B	272	490
3B	13	25
HR	203	390
RBI	740	1,284
BB	570	1,115
SO	1,112	2,065
SB	34	175
AVG	.275	.286
SLG	.463	.501
WAR	39.7	59.7

Carlos Correa’s full profile →Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Carlos Correa vs

Paul Goldschmidt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.