Head to head · 2026 batting

Carlos Correa vs Paul Goldschmidt

So far in 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.0 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Carlos Correa HOU

Paul Goldschmidt NYY

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Carlos Correa	Paul Goldschmidt
G	32	101
PA	141	370
H	34	85
HR	3	18
RBI	16	50
SB	1	1
AVG	.279	.253
OBP	.369	.316
SLG	.418	.455
OPS	.787	.772
ISO	.139	.202
BB%	12.8%	7.8%
K%	18.4%	23.0%
wOBA	.350	.335
wRC+	124	107
WAR	1.0	1.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Carlos Correa	Paul Goldschmidt
G	1,282	1,704
PA	5,485	7,243
H	1,332	1,785
2B	272	362
3B	13	19
HR	203	307
RBI	740	980
BB	570	872
SO	1,112	1,626
SB	34	129
AVG	.275	.285
SLG	.463	.496
WAR	39.7	45.5

Carlos Correa’s full profile →Paul Goldschmidt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Carlos Correa vs

Paul Goldschmidt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.