DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Alonso vs Mike Trout

In 2026 Pete Alonso has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
StatisticPete AlonsoMike Trout
G161142
PA700634
H161124
HR4322
RBI11354
SB511
AVG.267.242
OBP.363.382
SLG.522.421
OPS.884.803
ISO.254.179
BB%11.6%16.9%
K%24.1%26.0%
wOBA.381.358
wRC+148134
WAR4.94.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
StatisticPete AlonsoMike Trout
G1,1681,297
PA5,0165,642
H1,1121,306
2B207240
3B829
HR307328
RBI825765
BB500905
SO1,1531,339
SB23123
AVG.255.283
SLG.517.562
WAR28.563.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.