Head to head · 2026 batting

Jake Bauers vs Mike Trout

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 4.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jake Bauers MIL

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Bauers	Mike Trout
G	144	142
PA	578	634
H	127	124
HR	26	22
RBI	86	54
SB	11	11
AVG	.266	.242
OBP	.389	.382
SLG	.484	.421
OPS	.874	.803
ISO	.218	.179
BB%	16.3%	16.9%
K%	27.0%	26.0%
wOBA	.384	.358
wRC+	145	134
WAR	4.4	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jake Bauers	Mike Trout
G	743	1,297
PA	2,540	5,642
H	487	1,306
2B	100	240
3B	7	29
HR	84	328
RBI	297	765
BB	321	905
SO	725	1,339
SB	50	123
AVG	.223	.283
SLG	.391	.562
WAR	6.2	63.8

Jake Bauers’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Bauers vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.