Head to head · 2026 batting

Jake Bauers vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jake Bauers MIL

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Bauers	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	144	162
PA	578	726
H	127	175
HR	26	45
RBI	86	107
SB	11	41
AVG	.266	.280
OBP	.389	.372
SLG	.484	.570
OPS	.874	.943
ISO	.218	.291
BB%	16.3%	11.4%
K%	27.0%	25.8%
wOBA	.384	.402
wRC+	145	157
WAR	4.4	8.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jake Bauers	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	743	448
PA	2,540	1,802
H	487	409
2B	100	81
3B	7	18
HR	84	86
RBI	297	250
BB	321	136
SO	725	447
SB	50	105
AVG	.223	.255
SLG	.391	.489
WAR	6.2	13.6

Jake Bauers’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Bauers vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.