Head to head · 2026 batting

Mitch Garver vs Taylor Trammell

So far in 2026 Mitch Garver has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Mitch Garver SEA

Taylor Trammell HOU

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Taylor Trammell
G	47	88
PA	149	273
H	22	49
HR	4	8
RBI	15	22
SB	1	4
AVG	.175	.202
OBP	.302	.290
SLG	.294	.360
OPS	.596	.650
ISO	.119	.157
BB%	14.8%	9.5%
K%	32.9%	31.1%
wOBA	.282	.292
wRC+	77	83
WAR	0.2	-0.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Taylor Trammell
G	683	253
PA	2,498	767
H	497	124
2B	95	33
3B	7	2
HR	110	26
RBI	324	73
BB	286	83
SO	679	259
SB	6	11
AVG	.229	.185
SLG	.432	.357
WAR	10.2	-0.1

Mitch Garver’s full profile →Taylor Trammell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mitch Garver vs

Taylor Trammell vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.