Head to head · 2026 batting

Mitch Garver vs Daniel Schneemann

So far in 2026 Mitch Garver has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Mitch Garver SEA

Daniel Schneemann CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Daniel Schneemann
G	47	87
PA	149	282
H	22	53
HR	4	6
RBI	15	29
SB	1	6
AVG	.175	.205
OBP	.302	.273
SLG	.294	.318
OPS	.596	.591
ISO	.119	.112
BB%	14.8%	8.5%
K%	32.9%	29.8%
wOBA	.282	.268
wRC+	77	63
WAR	0.2	-0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Daniel Schneemann
G	683	287
PA	2,498	925
H	497	173
2B	95	39
3B	7	3
HR	110	23
RBI	324	92
BB	286	87
SO	679	271
SB	6	18
AVG	.229	.208
SLG	.432	.346
WAR	10.2	1.3

Mitch Garver’s full profile →Daniel Schneemann’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mitch Garver vs

Daniel Schneemann vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.