Head to head · 2026 batting

Mitch Garver vs Nathaniel Lowe

So far in 2026 Nathaniel Lowe has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Mitch Garver SEA

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Nathaniel Lowe
G	47	117
PA	149	412
H	22	94
HR	4	17
RBI	15	59
SB	1	0
AVG	.175	.255
OBP	.302	.323
SLG	.294	.454
OPS	.596	.777
ISO	.119	.198
BB%	14.8%	9.0%
K%	32.9%	23.8%
wOBA	.282	.338
wRC+	77	117
WAR	0.2	1.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Mitch Garver	Nathaniel Lowe
G	683	954
PA	2,498	3,842
H	497	890
2B	95	159
3B	7	13
HR	110	124
RBI	324	472
BB	286	413
SO	679	934
SB	6	15
AVG	.229	.263
SLG	.432	.427
WAR	10.2	14.2

Mitch Garver’s full profile →Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mitch Garver vs

Nathaniel Lowe vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.