Head to head · 2026 batting
Mitch Garver vs Nathaniel Lowe
In 2026 Nathaniel Lowe has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Mitch Garver | Nathaniel Lowe |
|---|---|---|
| G | 47 | 123 |
| PA | 149 | 429 |
| H | 22 | 96 |
| HR | 4 | 17 |
| RBI | 15 | 64 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .175 | .252 |
| OBP | .302 | .317 |
| SLG | .294 | .444 |
| OPS | .596 | .761 |
| ISO | .119 | .192 |
| BB% | 14.8% | 8.9% |
| K% | 32.9% | 23.1% |
| wOBA | .281 | .330 |
| wRC+ | 77 | 111 |
| WAR | 0.2 | 1.2 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Mitch Garver | Nathaniel Lowe |
|---|---|---|
| G | 24 | 32 |
| PA | 83 | 125 |
| H | 16 | 24 |
| HR | 3 | 3 |
| RBI | 16 | 11 |
| BB | 8 | 12 |
| SO | 20 | 34 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .219 | .212 |
| OBP | .301 | .288 |
| SLG | .397 | .327 |
| OPS | .698 | .615 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Mitch Garver | Nathaniel Lowe |
|---|---|---|
| G | 683 | 960 |
| PA | 2,498 | 3,859 |
| H | 497 | 892 |
| 2B | 95 | 159 |
| 3B | 7 | 13 |
| HR | 110 | 124 |
| RBI | 324 | 477 |
| BB | 286 | 414 |
| SO | 679 | 935 |
| SB | 6 | 15 |
| AVG | .229 | .262 |
| SLG | .432 | .426 |
| WAR | 10.2 | 14.0 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

