Head to head · 2026 batting

Thomas Saggese vs Daniel Schneemann

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Thomas Saggese STL

Daniel Schneemann CLE

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Thomas Saggese	Daniel Schneemann
G	53	88
PA	180	286
H	38	55
HR	4	7
RBI	14	30
SB	4	7
AVG	.235	.210
OBP	.294	.276
SLG	.352	.332
OPS	.646	.608
ISO	.117	.122
BB%	7.2%	8.4%
K%	27.2%	29.4%
wOBA	.289	.274
wRC+	82	68
WAR	0.1	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Thomas Saggese	Daniel Schneemann
G	148	288
PA	527	929
H	119	175
2B	24	39
3B	1	3
HR	7	24
RBI	43	93
BB	31	87
SO	146	271
SB	7	19
AVG	.245	.210
SLG	.342	.350
WAR	0.7	1.5

Thomas Saggese’s full profile →Daniel Schneemann’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Thomas Saggese vs

Daniel Schneemann vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.