Head to head · 2026 batting

Rafael Devers vs Mike Trout

So far in 2026 Mike Trout has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Rafael Devers SF

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Rafael Devers	Mike Trout
G	148	136
PA	633	607
H	144	119
HR	37	21
RBI	98	53
SB	0	11
AVG	.258	.241
OBP	.340	.380
SLG	.525	.420
OPS	.865	.799
ISO	.267	.178
BB%	10.9%	16.6%
K%	25.4%	26.0%
wOBA	.368	.355
wRC+	137	131
WAR	3.6	4.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Rafael Devers	Mike Trout
G	1,290	1,291
PA	5,577	5,615
H	1,359	1,301
2B	324	239
3B	13	29
HR	272	327
RBI	845	764
BB	539	899
SO	1,247	1,332
SB	33	123
AVG	.274	.284
SLG	.508	.562
WAR	37.3	63.5

Rafael Devers’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Rafael Devers vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.