Head to head · 2026 World Series batting

Yandy Díaz vs Garrett Mitchell

In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 World Series, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-1 over the Tampa Bay Rays.

Yandy Díaz TB

Garrett Mitchell MIL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 World Series.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Garrett Mitchell
G	5	5
PA	22	21
H	3	3
HR	0	0
RBI	1	2
BB	2	2
SO	5	8
SB	0	0
AVG	.150	.158
OBP	.227	.238
SLG	.200	.158
OPS	.427	.396

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Garrett Mitchell
G	40	15
PA	160	59
H	30	10
HR	4	3
RBI	10	7
BB	15	7
SO	36	21
SB	0	1
AVG	.208	.192
OBP	.287	.288
SLG	.347	.404
OPS	.635	.692

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Garrett Mitchell
G	154	144
PA	686	531
H	180	121
HR	22	11
RBI	85	65
SB	3	14
AVG	.293	.262
OBP	.359	.354
SLG	.446	.416
OPS	.805	.771
ISO	.153	.154
BB%	8.2%	11.3%
K%	14.3%	31.5%
wOBA	.352	.343
wRC+	123	117
WAR	2.5	3.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Yandy Díaz	Garrett Mitchell
G	1,052	277
PA	4,441	974
H	1,137	220
2B	210	51
3B	8	9
HR	122	24
RBI	509	105
BB	465	105
SO	656	317
SB	14	37
AVG	.291	.259
SLG	.442	.424
WAR	22.8	6.3

Yandy Díaz’s full profile →Garrett Mitchell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Yandy Díaz vs

Garrett Mitchell vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.