Head to head · 2026 World Series batting
Jonathan Aranda vs Garrett Mitchell
In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 5 |
| PA | 19 | 21 |
| H | 4 | 3 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 1 | 2 |
| SO | 4 | 8 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .222 | .158 |
| OBP | .263 | .238 |
| SLG | .278 | .158 |
| OPS | .541 | .396 |
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 15 |
| PA | 60 | 59 |
| H | 13 | 10 |
| HR | 1 | 3 |
| RBI | 5 | 7 |
| BB | 2 | 7 |
| SO | 10 | 21 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .241 | .192 |
| OBP | .305 | .288 |
| SLG | .315 | .404 |
| OPS | .620 | .692 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 155 | 144 |
| PA | 668 | 531 |
| H | 159 | 121 |
| HR | 22 | 11 |
| RBI | 92 | 65 |
| SB | 0 | 14 |
| AVG | .274 | .262 |
| OBP | .358 | .354 |
| SLG | .434 | .416 |
| OPS | .792 | .771 |
| ISO | .160 | .154 |
| BB% | 10.3% | 11.3% |
| K% | 24.4% | 31.5% |
| wOBA | .350 | .343 |
| wRC+ | 122 | 117 |
| WAR | 2.8 | 3.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 369 | 277 |
| PA | 1,423 | 974 |
| H | 341 | 220 |
| 2B | 64 | 51 |
| 3B | 1 | 9 |
| HR | 46 | 24 |
| RBI | 184 | 105 |
| BB | 143 | 105 |
| SO | 356 | 317 |
| SB | 0 | 37 |
| AVG | .274 | .259 |
| SLG | .438 | .424 |
| WAR | 6.3 | 6.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

