Head to head · 2026 World Series batting
Garrett Mitchell vs Richie Palacios
In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 1.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 3 |
| PA | 21 | 10 |
| H | 3 | 0 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 2 | 0 |
| BB | 2 | 0 |
| SO | 8 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .158 | .000 |
| OBP | .238 | .000 |
| SLG | .158 | .000 |
| OPS | .396 | .000 |
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 10 |
| PA | 59 | 32 |
| H | 10 | 8 |
| HR | 3 | 0 |
| RBI | 7 | 4 |
| BB | 7 | 0 |
| SO | 21 | 8 |
| SB | 1 | 1 |
| AVG | .192 | .258 |
| OBP | .288 | .258 |
| SLG | .404 | .355 |
| OPS | .692 | .613 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 144 | 122 |
| PA | 531 | 399 |
| H | 121 | 81 |
| HR | 11 | 10 |
| RBI | 65 | 57 |
| SB | 14 | 17 |
| AVG | .262 | .235 |
| OBP | .354 | .330 |
| SLG | .416 | .374 |
| OPS | .771 | .704 |
| ISO | .154 | .139 |
| BB% | 11.3% | 11.5% |
| K% | 31.5% | 17.0% |
| wOBA | .343 | .319 |
| wRC+ | 117 | 100 |
| WAR | 3.3 | 1.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Garrett Mitchell | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 277 | 313 |
| PA | 974 | 988 |
| H | 220 | 204 |
| 2B | 51 | 36 |
| 3B | 9 | 3 |
| HR | 24 | 22 |
| RBI | 105 | 107 |
| BB | 105 | 111 |
| SO | 317 | 175 |
| SB | 37 | 44 |
| AVG | .259 | .238 |
| SLG | .424 | .364 |
| WAR | 6.3 | 3.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

